🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step is a direct warning by the Kremlin against proposals to use frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days on a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main custodian for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU officials have argued that their plan is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that title of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European countries shortly after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has called any utilization of the assets as theft. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, including confiscating European private investors' assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house refused to comment on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are working on measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be required to return the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful message that if you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."